Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Wales Interactive Group Limited

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Wales Interactive Group Limited maintains a focused prosecution profile in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action, which represents the entirety of its active engagement with the patent office. This single action is being reviewed by 1 distinct examiner, concentrating the company's legal efforts on a single point of contact.

The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a specific technical focus for the pending application. MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently handling 1 pending office action. Since this 1 action is the only one pending for the company, the examiner's specific expertise and prior art interpretations will be the primary factor in the portfolio's immediate progress. This streamlined approach allows for a very targeted response strategy but relies heavily on the outcome of a single examination process.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 1 30.7% +20.5%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18700504 VISUAL PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENT FOR DEVELOPING INTERACTIVE MEDIA PROGRAMS MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 6d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3625 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18700504 VISUAL PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENT FOR DEVELOPING INTERACTIVE MEDIA PROGRAMS MEINECKE DIAZ, SUSANNA M 3625 §103 Final Rejection 6d Pending Apr 11, 2024

Managing Wales Interactive Group Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month