Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Wall To Wall LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Wall To Wall LLC operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The company currently has 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a singular focus for the company's current prosecution activity, with all work consolidated under the distinct examiner and the distinct art unit.

HERRING, BRENT W serves as the busiest examiner for this portfolio. This examiner is managing the 1 pending office action. The presence of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit for the company's pending workload means that the outcome of its current patent efforts depends on the review of this individual within their specific art unit. This concentrated profile suggests that the company's current innovations are focused within a narrow technical scope. Practitioners can dedicate their efforts to understanding the specific examination style and technical requirements of the assigned examiner and art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HERRING, BRENT W 1 69.1% +16.8%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18720613 INTEGRATED ROOF MODULE AND MODULAR ROOF SYSTEM THEREOF HERRING, BRENT W —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18720613 INTEGRATED ROOF MODULE AND MODULAR ROOF SYSTEM THEREOF HERRING, BRENT W —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3633 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18720613 INTEGRATED ROOF MODULE AND MODULAR ROOF SYSTEM THEREOF HERRING, BRENT W 3633 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 14, 2024

Managing Wall To Wall LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month