Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Walltopia Ad currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This action is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. Such a narrow distribution indicates a highly concentrated prosecution focus for the company's active matters at the patent office.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This specific examiner handles the company's current pending workload. Because the busiest examiner pending count is 1, there are no other active examiners involved in the portfolio at this time. This concentration within 1 art unit and with 1 examiner suggests a specific technical niche for the pending application within the broader Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J | 1 | 81.8% | +16.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18916055 | SPLITTER DEVICE OF OR FOR A BELAY SYSTEM OF OR FOR AN AMUSEMENT FACILITY, BELAY SYSTEM INCLUDING SUCH A SPLITTER DEVICE AND AMUSEMENT FACILITY BEING EQUIPPED WITH SUCH A BELAY SYSTEM | MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18916055 | SPLITTER DEVICE OF OR FOR A BELAY SYSTEM OF OR FOR AN AMUSEMENT FACILITY, BELAY SYSTEM INCLUDING SUCH A SPLITTER DEVICE AND AMUSEMENT FACILITY BEING EQUIPPED WITH SUCH A BELAY SYSTEM | MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3615 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18916055 | SPLITTER DEVICE OF OR FOR A BELAY SYSTEM OF OR FOR AN AMUSEMENT FACILITY, BELAY SYSTEM INCLUDING SUCH A SPLITTER DEVICE AND AMUSEMENT FACILITY BEING EQUIPPED WITH SUCH A BELAY SYSTEM | MCCARRY JR, ROBERT J | 3615 | §102§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial