Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Walter AG

6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (67%)
1
Easy (17%)
1
Unknown (17%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (50%)
§102 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
No statute on record1 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DUMBRIS, SETH M 2 76.1% +17.0%
YOO, JUN S 1 78.1% +21.1%
RUFO, RYAN C 1 59.5% +41.1%
GATES, ERIC ANDREW 1 78.7% +14.0%
WHITMIRE, ERIC DANIEL 1 67.6% +34.3%

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17800824 TURNING TOOL WHITMIRE, ERIC DANIEL 26d
18288609 COATED CUTTING TOOL DUMBRIS, SETH M 29d
18288297 COATED CUTTING TOOL DUMBRIS, SETH M 29d
18030521 DRILL POINT GATES, ERIC ANDREW 29d
18574527 THREAD CUTTING DRILL TOOL FOR METAL CUTTING RUFO, RYAN C 39d
18574999 COATED CUTTING TOOL YOO, JUN S 56d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3722 3
1784 2
3726 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18574999 COATED CUTTING TOOL YOO, JUN S 3726 §103 Non-Final OA 56d Pending Dec 28, 2023
18574527 THREAD CUTTING DRILL TOOL FOR METAL CUTTING RUFO, RYAN C 3722 §103 Non-Final OA 39d Pending Dec 27, 2023
18288609 COATED CUTTING TOOL DUMBRIS, SETH M 1784 Other Final Rejection 29d Pending Oct 27, 2023
18288297 COATED CUTTING TOOL DUMBRIS, SETH M 1784 §102 Final Rejection 29d Pending Oct 25, 2023
18030521 DRILL POINT GATES, ERIC ANDREW 3722 §112 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Apr 06, 2023
17800824 TURNING TOOL WHITMIRE, ERIC DANIEL 3722 §103 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Aug 18, 2022

Managing Walter AG's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month