Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Warnermedia Direct LLC

Technology area: Networking & Security

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Warnermedia Direct LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action within the Networking & Security technology area. This prosecution activity is concentrated in 1 distinct art unit, which suggests that the technical subject matter is highly specialized. With 1 distinct examiner assigned to the portfolio, the applicant can maintain a consistent communication channel with the USPTO.

BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL is the busiest examiner for this company and is currently responsible for 1 pending office action. Because this 1 pending office action represents the current total for the portfolio, the prosecution strategy is highly dependent on the specific preferences of BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL. The 1 distinct art unit involved indicates that the prosecution does not face the challenge of differing procedural interpretations from various office branches.

Practitioners should focus on the specific examination history of BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL to prepare for the 1 pending office action. The Networking & Security technology area requires a deep understanding of relevant technical standards. By operating within 1 distinct art unit, the company can streamline its internal documentation and response strategies. This centralized structure, featuring 1 distinct examiner, allows for a specific and focused prosecution timeline.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL 1 39.1% +33.4%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17653450 SIMULTANEOUS, SESSION LEVEL EXPERIMENTATION AND EXPERIENCES DEPLOYMENT BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2437 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17653450 SIMULTANEOUS, SESSION LEVEL EXPERIMENTATION AND EXPERIENCES DEPLOYMENT BINCZAK, BRANDON MICHAEL 2437 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 03, 2022

Managing Warnermedia Direct LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month