Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Watchrx Inc. currently maintains 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This specific matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B, who also serves as the busiest examiner for the company. The concentration of the workload under the assigned individual suggests a highly centralized prosecution phase where the outcome of the portfolio is currently dependent on the examiner's review and their specific interpretation of the relevant prior art.
The data shows that the company is operating within a distinct art unit. This indicates that the technical scope of the pending application is specialized enough to remain within a specific administrative group. For a company with an active action, this focus allows for a dedicated response strategy tailored to the specific standards of that art unit and the preferences of the assigned examiner. Practitioners should focus on the specific examination history of this examiner to anticipate potential hurdles in this technology area, as the lack of examiner diversity means there are no alternative pathways for these claims at present.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B | 1 | 47.8% | +31.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18983952 | Medication Adherence Device And Coordinated Care Platform | BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B | 40d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18983952 | Medication Adherence Device And Coordinated Care Platform | BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B | 40d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3684 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18983952 | Medication Adherence Device And Coordinated Care Platform | BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B | 3684 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | 40d | Pending | Dec 17, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial