Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Waterise AS

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Waterise AS currently manages 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This matter is being examined by 1 distinct examiner, GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN, who is the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending case. The company's active prosecution is contained within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a narrow technical focus for its current USPTO filings.

The presence of 1 pending office action and a single distinct examiner means that the company's current legal strategy is focused on a single point of contact. For the practitioner, this simplifies the management of the portfolio, as there is only one set of examiner preferences to consider. The concentration within 1 distinct art unit further ensures that the examination process follows a consistent set of technical criteria for the Chemistry & Materials field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 1 33.3% +4.9%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17910699 Subsea desalination system for shallow water GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 67d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1777 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
17910699 Subsea desalination system for shallow water GERMAIN, ADAM ADRIEN 1777 §103§112 Final Rejection 67d overdue Pending Sep 09, 2022

Managing Waterise AS's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month