Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Waterlabs AI Technologies Private Limited

Technology area: Computing & Software

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Waterlabs AI Technologies Private Limited currently manages 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ALAM, SHIHAB, who also serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio. The prosecution is localized within 1 distinct art unit, which suggests a specific focus for the company's current patent applications. Having 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved means the applicant can focus on a consistent strategy without navigating different examiner styles.

ALAM, SHIHAB is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action, making this individual the primary point of contact at the office. For practitioners, this centralized oversight simplifies communication and allows for a direct negotiation process. The Computing & Software field involves specialized technical requirements, and having 1 distinct examiner provides an opportunity to build a focused legal argument. The administrative requirements for 1 pending office action are specific to this single matter. This structure allows for a dedicated allocation of resources toward achieving a successful outcome.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
100% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALAM, SHIHAB 1 — —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2197 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18361688 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PRIORITY-BASED RESOURCE SCHEDULING WITH LOAD BALANCING ALAM, SHIHAB 2197 §103 Final Rejection 16d overdue Pending Jul 28, 2023

Managing Waterlabs AI Technologies Private Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month