Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days
Wavemark Inc. is focused on the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. The company has 2 pending office actions. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, ensuring independent evaluation for each matter. This distribution suggests that the company's applications are subject to multiple perspectives rather than a single point of review.
The prosecution involves 2 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's innovations are being categorized into two different specialized groups. Practitioners must be prepared to address the specific nuances of these 2 units. The variety of units indicates that the portfolio's technical scope is not limited to a single specialized niche.
KIM, AHSHIK is the busiest examiner for the portfolio. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. The busiest examiner pending count is 1, meaning the workload is divided equally between the examiners. Neither examiner has a dominant influence over the company's current pending status. Practitioners should focus on the individual requirements of each official to move the applications forward.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| No statute on record | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KIM, AHSHIK | 1 | 87.8% | +10.6% |
| WILDER, ANDREW H | 1 | 62.6% | +58.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18634290 | FILTERING CROSS READS AMONG RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) ENABLED READERS AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE THEREOF | WILDER, ANDREW H | 409d overdue |
| 19229159 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING INVENTORY THROUGH THE SUPPLY CHAIN AND LIFECYCLE OF A PRODUCT | KIM, AHSHIK | 8d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2876 | 1 |
| 3627 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19229159 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MANAGING INVENTORY THROUGH THE SUPPLY CHAIN AND LIFECYCLE OF A PRODUCT | KIM, AHSHIK | 2876 | Other | Final Rejection | 8d overdue | Pending | Jun 05, 2025 |
| 18634290 | FILTERING CROSS READS AMONG RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION (RFID) ENABLED READERS AND SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE THEREOF | WILDER, ANDREW H | 3627 | §103 | Final Rejection | 409d overdue | Pending | Apr 12, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial