Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Waziv Inc.

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Waziv Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. This action involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The prosecution is highly centralized, with all current activity occurring within a single technical group. This suggests a streamlined approach where the company is currently focused on a specific technical advancement rather than a broad array of filings.

BETIT, JACOB F is the busiest examiner, handling the 1 pending office action. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner, the company's current USPTO interactions are limited to a single individual. This concentration simplifies the management of the pending matter within the specified art unit. This centralized examination structure allows for a more predictable interaction with the patent office, as there are no competing examiner styles or differing art unit standards to navigate for the current pending matter.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BETIT, JACOB F 1 33.9% +17.0%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18515460 Method and System for Online Marketplace Facilitating Dynamic Resale of Event Tickets BETIT, JACOB F —

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18515460 Method and System for Online Marketplace Facilitating Dynamic Resale of Event Tickets BETIT, JACOB F —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3688 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18515460 Method and System for Online Marketplace Facilitating Dynamic Resale of Event Tickets BETIT, JACOB F 3688 §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2023

Managing Waziv Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month