Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Web Access LLC

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Web Access LLC currently has 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This 1 action is being processed by 1 distinct examiner, which indicates that the company's current patent prosecution is centralized. Such a distribution suggests that the company's current legal efforts are focused on a technical advancement rather than an array of diverse filings.

The prosecution is situated within 1 distinct art unit, ensuring that the technical review remains within an administrative group. HOLCOMB, MARK is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, who holds 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since the portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner, this person is responsible for every pending matter currently recorded. This engagement within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area affects the management of the company's pending intellectual property.

Managing 1 pending office action in this technology area allows for a dialogue with the USPTO. The use of 1 distinct art unit limits the complexity of the prosecution process. This environment is for maintaining arguments and responses during the examination. Practitioners can focus their resources on the requirements from the 1 assigned examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (50%)
§101 + other1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
COLEMAN, CHARLES P. 1 16.0% +19.1%
HOLCOMB, MARK 1 33.4% +40.0%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
15928685 Secure Network Based Order Confirmation, Transportation, and Delivery Processes Utilizing Logistics Automation COLEMAN, CHARLES P. 55d
15844531 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR READMISSIONS RISK RATIO QUOTIENT GENERATION HOLCOMB, MARK 86d

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
15928685 Secure Network Based Order Confirmation, Transportation, and Delivery Processes Utilizing Logistics Automation COLEMAN, CHARLES P. 55d
15844531 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR READMISSIONS RISK RATIO QUOTIENT GENERATION HOLCOMB, MARK 86d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3683 1
3685 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
15928685 Secure Network Based Order Confirmation, Transportation, and Delivery Processes Utilizing Logistics Automation COLEMAN, CHARLES P. 3683 §101 Final Rejection 55d Pending Mar 22, 2018
15844531 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND APPARATUS FOR READMISSIONS RISK RATIO QUOTIENT GENERATION HOLCOMB, MARK 3685 §101§103 Final Rejection 86d Pending Dec 16, 2017

Managing Web Access LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Web Access LLC have?

Web Access LLC has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Web Access LLC applications?

Charles P. Coleman has the most, with 1 of Web Access LLC's pending office actions.

What technology area are Web Access LLC's patent applications in?

Mostly Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems (USPTO Tech Center 3600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month