Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wedrive Co. Ltd. operates in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area with 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to a distinct art unit. The portfolio's current activity is concentrated in a single point of prosecution within the patent office.
LAKHANI, ANDREW C is the distinct examiner assigned to the portfolio, holding 1 pending office action. This indicates that the company's current interactions with the patent office are limited to a single examiner's review. The outcome of the company's current filing depends entirely on the interpretation of this individual within their specific art unit.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 1 | 23.0% | +28.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18868123 | METHOD OF CALCULATING CARBON EMISSION AMOUNT USING TRANSPORTATION DATA AND SERVER | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18868123 | METHOD OF CALCULATING CARBON EMISSION AMOUNT USING TRANSPORTATION DATA AND SERVER | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3629 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18868123 | METHOD OF CALCULATING CARBON EMISSION AMOUNT USING TRANSPORTATION DATA AND SERVER | LAKHANI, ANDREW C | 3629 | §101§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 21, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial