Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 14, 2026

Weihai Winner Innovation Ocean Technology Co. Ltd.

3 pending office actions • 1 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Portfolio Summary

3
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (67%)
1
Easy (33%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (33%)
§112 only1 (33%)
Double-patenting + other1 (33%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
1
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

30 h
Manual time on pending OAs
6 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
10 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAYES, JOVON E 1 84.7% +9.7%
AVILA, STEPHEN P 1 80.4% +10.1%
VENNE, DANIEL V 1 71.3% +15.0%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18394341 DETACHABLE PADDLE AVILA, STEPHEN P 26d overdue
18991217 DOUBLE-CHAMBER INFLATABLE KAYAK HAYES, JOVON E

Interview Candidates (2)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18351951 FOUR-CHAMBER INFLATABLE KAYAK VENNE, DANIEL V 38d overdue
18394341 DETACHABLE PADDLE AVILA, STEPHEN P 26d overdue

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3615 2

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18991217 DOUBLE-CHAMBER INFLATABLE KAYAK HAYES, JOVON E §112DP Non-Final OA Pending Dec 20, 2024
18394341 DETACHABLE PADDLE AVILA, STEPHEN P 3615 §103 Non-Final OA 26d overdue Pending Dec 22, 2023
18351951 FOUR-CHAMBER INFLATABLE KAYAK VENNE, DANIEL V 3615 §112 Non-Final OA 38d overdue Pending Jul 13, 2023

Managing Weihai Winner Innovation Ocean Technology Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month