Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Weinmann Holzbausystemtechnik GmbH

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Weinmann Holzbausystemtechnik GmbH currently has 2 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, which means that each pending matter is being reviewed by a different individual. For a practitioner, this distribution of actions to examiners requires a tailored approach for each application, as there is no overlap in the personnel making the decisions on these specific cases.

The portfolio's activity is further divided among 2 distinct art units. This separation into the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector indicates that the company's technology may span different technical niches or administrative categories at the patent office. Managing prosecution across multiple art units often involves addressing different sets of examination guidelines or technical precedents, even when the applications fall under the same broad technology area.

HOLLY, LEE A is identified as the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action. While HOLLY, LEE A is the busiest, they only manage 1 of the company's 2 active matters. This distribution suggests that the company's prosecution risks are spread across the available examiners, as no single examiner controls the majority of the pending workload. Practitioners should maintain distinct strategies for HOLLY, LEE A and the other examiner involved in the portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

2
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (50%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

20 h
Manual time on pending OAs
4 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
7 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.2 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HOLLY, LEE A 1 75.0% +5.9%
LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 1 54.8% +31.1%

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18972568 Method for producing building elements HOLLY, LEE A 11d overdue

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18214655 SAWING DEVICE LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 13d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3729 1
3724 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18972568 Method for producing building elements HOLLY, LEE A 3729 §102§103 Non-Final OA 11d overdue Pending Dec 06, 2024
18214655 SAWING DEVICE LEE, LAURA MICHELLE 3724 §103 Final Rejection 13d Pending Jun 27, 2023

Managing Weinmann Holzbausystemtechnik GmbH's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Weinmann Holzbausystemtechnik GmbH have?

Weinmann Holzbausystemtechnik GmbH has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Weinmann Holzbausystemtechnik GmbH applications?

Lee A Holly has the most, with 1 of Weinmann Holzbausystemtechnik GmbH's pending office actions.

What technology area are Weinmann Holzbausystemtechnik GmbH's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month