Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wellsite Navigator LLC is managing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. The current activity is concentrated in this pending case, reflecting a singular focus for the company's active patent applications.
PHAM, CLINT V is the busiest examiner, with 1 busiest examiner pending action. This examiner handles the company's current pending office action volume within the 1 distinct art unit. The Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area provides the technical framework for this ongoing review process.
The company's current patent office interaction is defined by 1 pending office action. Having 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit involved means that the prosecution is not spread across different departments. This centralization indicates that the company's current legal efforts are focused on the technical area of the assigned art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PHAM, CLINT V | 1 | 44.0% | +24.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18799040 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF PREFERRED ROUTES | PHAM, CLINT V | 52d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18799040 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF PREFERRED ROUTES | PHAM, CLINT V | 52d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3663 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18799040 | SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF PREFERRED ROUTES | PHAM, CLINT V | 3663 | §102§103 | Final Rejection | 52d overdue | Pending | Aug 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial