Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days
Welltec Manufacturing Center Completions Aps currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This single action is distributed across 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the prosecution is limited to these specific points of review. For a practitioner, this concentration means that the current legal strategy is focused on a single administrative path within the patent office, which can lead to consistent feedback but also creates a single point of review for the company's pending matters.
The busiest examiner identified in the data is AHUJA, ANURADHA, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. This specific examiner's workload accounts for the total number of the company's currently active office actions, suggesting that prosecution outcomes for the portfolio are presently tied to a single individual's interpretation of the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. Because there is only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company does not currently face the challenge of reconciling different examiner styles or conflicting requirements across multiple art units.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| AHUJA, ANURADHA | 1 | 72.6% | +56.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18797268 | DOWNHOLE COMPLETION SYSTEM | AHUJA, ANURADHA | 12d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18797268 | DOWNHOLE COMPLETION SYSTEM | AHUJA, ANURADHA | 12d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3674 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18797268 | DOWNHOLE COMPLETION SYSTEM | AHUJA, ANURADHA | 3674 | §103§112 | Final Rejection | 12d | Pending | Aug 07, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial