Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Wert Intelligence Co. Ltd. currently has 2 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These actions are split between 2 distinct examiners, indicating that no single examiner is handling the entire portfolio. The workload is also spread across 2 distinct art units, which suggests the company's intellectual property covers diverse sub-sectors within its primary technology field. This distribution requires the applicant to address the specific technical standards of 2 different examining groups.
WONG, ERIC TAK WAI is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Since there are 2 pending office actions in total, the busiest examiner is responsible for 1 action. This distribution across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units requires managing multiple simultaneous examiner interactions. The fact that 2 pending office actions involve 2 distinct examiners means that the company cannot rely on a single relationship or consistent examiner history to streamline its current prosecution efforts.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 2 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 1 | 42.2% | +37.8% |
| WONG, ERIC TAK WAI | 1 | 50.6% | +13.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18979917 | METHOD FOR EXTRACTING OBJECTIVE AND SOLUTION OF PATENT DOCUMENT BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING DEVICE | WONG, ERIC TAK WAI | 41d |
| 18979885 | AI BASED DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION METHOD AND A COMPUTING DEVICE | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18979917 | METHOD FOR EXTRACTING OBJECTIVE AND SOLUTION OF PATENT DOCUMENT BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING DEVICE | WONG, ERIC TAK WAI | 41d |
| 18979885 | AI BASED DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION METHOD AND A COMPUTING DEVICE | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2169 | 1 |
| 3693 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18979885 | AI BASED DOCUMENT CLASSIFICATION METHOD AND A COMPUTING DEVICE | ALLEN, BRITTANY N | 2169 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
| 18979917 | METHOD FOR EXTRACTING OBJECTIVE AND SOLUTION OF PATENT DOCUMENT BASED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING DEVICE | WONG, ERIC TAK WAI | 3693 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 41d | Pending | Dec 13, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial