Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

West Texas Technology Partners LLC

4 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
2
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
2
Unknown (50%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
Double-patenting + other1 (25%)
No statute on record2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
25% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
25% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
JOHNSON, GERALD 1 78.2% +9.1%
MILLER, ALAN S 1 70.3% +26.6%
MANIWANG, JOSEPH R 1 85.4% +14.0%
BASEHOAR, ADAM L 1 59.0% +23.9%

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18748808 Method and Apparatus for Switching Between Sensors MANIWANG, JOSEPH R 43d overdue
18962407 AUGMENTED REALITY TASK FLOW OPTIMIZATION SYSTEMS MILLER, ALAN S 42d
17217621 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANIPULATING CONTENT IN AN INTERFACE BASEHOAR, ADAM L 63d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3797 1
3625 1
2441 1
3992 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18975575 Methods and Apparatuses for Applying Free Space Inputs for Surface Constrained Controls JOHNSON, GERALD 3797 §103 Non-Final OA 91d overdue Pending Dec 10, 2024
18962407 AUGMENTED REALITY TASK FLOW OPTIMIZATION SYSTEMS MILLER, ALAN S 3625 Other Non-Final OA 42d Pending Nov 27, 2024
18748808 Method and Apparatus for Switching Between Sensors MANIWANG, JOSEPH R 2441 Other Non-Final OA 43d overdue Pending Jun 20, 2024
17217621 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANIPULATING CONTENT IN AN INTERFACE BASEHOAR, ADAM L 3992 DPOther Non-Final OA 63d Pending Mar 30, 2021

Managing West Texas Technology Partners LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month