Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 1 of 1 (100%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wikipad Inc. currently has 1 pending office action under review at the patent office. The prosecution of this portfolio involves 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. These figures reflect a specific and limited scope of current activity for the company's intellectual property assets. With only 1 distinct art unit involved, the company's current applications are not distributed across different technical departments, which simplifies the administrative tracking of its pending matters and ensures that the technical review remains within a single specialized group.
GILBERT, WILLIAM V is the busiest examiner for Wikipad Inc., holding 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending office action accounts for the entirety of the 1 pending office action reported for the company. The presence of only 1 distinct examiner means that the company's current legal strategy is focused on a single point of contact. This consolidated examination environment allows for a direct relationship with the examiner, although it also means that the company's immediate patent prospects are subject to the findings of this individual in the absence of other active matters.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GILBERT, WILLIAM V | 1 | 57.9% | +25.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17127874 | Game Controller with Structural Bridge | GILBERT, WILLIAM V | 118d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17127874 | Game Controller with Structural Bridge | GILBERT, WILLIAM V | 118d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3993 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17127874 | Game Controller with Structural Bridge | GILBERT, WILLIAM V | 3993 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | 118d overdue | AI Ready | Dec 18, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial