Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wild Type Inc. is involved in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The company's patent prosecution data shows 1 pending office action. This activity is handled by 1 distinct examiner and is located within 1 distinct art unit. Having 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company's current intellectual property focus is directed toward a specific biological or pharmaceutical classification. This concentration simplifies the administrative oversight of the pending matter.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is JOHNSON, KARA D, who is currently processing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This examiner manages the 1 pending office action that constitutes the entirety of the company's current workload. For the patent practitioner, the prosecution strategy must be closely aligned with the expectations of JOHNSON, KARA D. The presence of 1 pending office action reflects a targeted approach to patent acquisition. Success in this phase depends on a clear and effective response to the single examiner currently reviewing the company's application.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JOHNSON, KARA D | 1 | 69.5% | +24.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16620326 | EX VIVO MEAT PRODUCTION | JOHNSON, KARA D | 139d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1632 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16620326 | EX VIVO MEAT PRODUCTION | JOHNSON, KARA D | 1632 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 139d overdue | Pending | Dec 06, 2019 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial