Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wilda Diaz is currently managing 1 pending office action. The prosecution is overseen by 1 distinct examiner, FUELLING, MICHAEL, who is also the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. This indicates that the current patent office engagement is limited to a single examiner and a single matter, allowing for a highly focused approach to the 1 pending office action.
The portfolio's current activity is located in 1 distinct art unit, reflecting a focused engagement with the patent office. Practitioners should prioritize understanding the examination patterns of FUELLING, MICHAEL, as he manages the entirety of the pending workload. The concentration in 1 distinct art unit suggests a targeted approach to securing intellectual property. This data profile shows a streamlined prosecution path with a single examiner and a single active case, where the practitioner can focus on the specific procedural requirements of 1 distinct art unit to advance the current application. The absence of a defined technology area requires practitioners to rely on the examiner's history.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FUELLING, MICHAEL | 1 | 43.7% | +31.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18674572 | Hydration Monitoring Device and System | FUELLING, MICHAEL | 26d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18674572 | Hydration Monitoring Device and System | FUELLING, MICHAEL | 26d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3992 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18674572 | Hydration Monitoring Device and System | FUELLING, MICHAEL | 3992 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 26d overdue | Pending | May 24, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial