Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Willett Enterprise Inc. Dba Scripguard has 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The active prosecution for this entity is limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit. This indicates a singular focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts in these mechanical and commercial sectors. The presence of a single art unit suggests that the applications are not being diverted into multiple examination groups.
KUMAR, RAKESH serves as the busiest examiner, currently handling 1 pending office action. This single action represents the entirety of the company's pending workload at the patent office. Because there is only 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution experience is centralized. The 1 pending office action will be the primary factor in the company's current patent strategy within the transportation and e-commerce fields. Practitioners should note that the current workload for this entity is concentrated under a single point of contact. The oversight by KUMAR, RAKESH suggests a singular focus for the company's current mechanical interests.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KUMAR, RAKESH | 1 | 57.2% | +28.2% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18217970 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLED DISPENSING | KUMAR, RAKESH | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18217970 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLED DISPENSING | KUMAR, RAKESH | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3651 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18217970 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLED DISPENSING | KUMAR, RAKESH | 3651 | §102§103§112 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Jul 03, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial