Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Wipro Limited

6 pending office actions • 5 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (50%)
§101 + other3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
33% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN 1 33.3% +30.1%
FONSECA LOPEZ, FRANCINI ALVARENGA 1 30.4% +49.0%
WALTON, CHESIREE A 1 30.2% +29.4%
BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 1 42.9% +66.4%
WOITACH, JOSEPH T 1 50.0% +27.5%
CHOI, PETER H 1 26.1% +18.5%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18337895 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PREDICTING CATASTROPHIC INCIDENTS IN A SERVICE SYSTEM GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN 19d overdue
17804895 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING MUTATIONS IN RIBONUCLEIC ACID STRAINS BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 5d overdue
18193330 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING DEMAND FOR SUPPLY CHAIN WALTON, CHESIREE A 22d
18298640 COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND SEQUENCE DESIGNING SYSTEM FOR DESIGNING CELL NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES FONSECA LOPEZ, FRANCINI ALVARENGA
17660259 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SELECTING CANDIDATE DRUG COMPOUNDS THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED DRUG REPURPOSING WOITACH, JOSEPH T
17471630 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY IDENTIFYING CHANGE IN CUSTOMER BEHAVIOUR AND PROVIDING APPROPRIATE PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS CHOI, PETER H

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18337895 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PREDICTING CATASTROPHIC INCIDENTS IN A SERVICE SYSTEM GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN 19d overdue
17804895 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING MUTATIONS IN RIBONUCLEIC ACID STRAINS BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 5d overdue
18193330 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING DEMAND FOR SUPPLY CHAIN WALTON, CHESIREE A 22d
18298640 COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND SEQUENCE DESIGNING SYSTEM FOR DESIGNING CELL NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES FONSECA LOPEZ, FRANCINI ALVARENGA
17660259 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SELECTING CANDIDATE DRUG COMPOUNDS THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED DRUG REPURPOSING WOITACH, JOSEPH T
17471630 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY IDENTIFYING CHANGE IN CUSTOMER BEHAVIOUR AND PROVIDING APPROPRIATE PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS CHOI, PETER H

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3625 1
3624 1
1685 1
1687 1
3681 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18337895 SYSTEM AND METHOD OF PREDICTING CATASTROPHIC INCIDENTS IN A SERVICE SYSTEM GURSKI, AMANDA KAREN 3625 §101 Final Rejection 19d overdue Pending Jun 20, 2023
18298640 COMPUTER IMPLEMENTED METHOD AND SEQUENCE DESIGNING SYSTEM FOR DESIGNING CELL NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCES FONSECA LOPEZ, FRANCINI ALVARENGA §101§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 11, 2023
18193330 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING DEMAND FOR SUPPLY CHAIN WALTON, CHESIREE A 3624 §101§102 Final Rejection 22d Pending Mar 30, 2023
17804895 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PREDICTING MUTATIONS IN RIBONUCLEIC ACID STRAINS BICKHAM, DAWN MARIE 1685 §101 Final Rejection 5d overdue Pending Jun 01, 2022
17660259 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SELECTING CANDIDATE DRUG COMPOUNDS THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)-BASED DRUG REPURPOSING WOITACH, JOSEPH T 1687 §101§103 Non-Final OA Pending Apr 22, 2022
17471630 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY IDENTIFYING CHANGE IN CUSTOMER BEHAVIOUR AND PROVIDING APPROPRIATE PERSONALIZED RECOMMENDATIONS CHOI, PETER H 3681 §101 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 10, 2021

Managing Wipro Limited's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month