Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Won Goo Kang is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This activity is concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a streamlined prosecution for the company's current filings. The fact that the matter is limited to 1 distinct art unit suggests that the technology being patented is specialized within a specific chemical classification.
The busiest examiner for the company is PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA, who handles 1 pending office action. Since there is only 1 distinct examiner involved in the company's current portfolio, the outcome of the pending matter depends on the specific interpretations of this individual. This lack of examiner variety means that the company's current prosecution experience is not diversified across different examination styles. For the applicant, the primary goal is to address the specific concerns of the 1 distinct examiner who is managing the 1 pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA | 1 | 54.4% | +28.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18078445 | COATED STEEL SHEET AND HOME APPLIANCE USING THE SAME | PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA | 13d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18078445 | COATED STEEL SHEET AND HOME APPLIANCE USING THE SAME | PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA | 13d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1783 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18078445 | COATED STEEL SHEET AND HOME APPLIANCE USING THE SAME | PLESZCZYNSKA, JOANNA | 1783 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | 13d | Pending | Dec 09, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial