Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Wontech Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action. This action is being handled by 1 distinct examiner. The portfolio currently shows 0 distinct art units, which suggests the pending matter is not yet classified or the data is not available for that field. This absence of art unit data indicates a unique status for the current pending application within the patent office's organizational structure.
FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, managing 1 pending office action. This single action represents the total volume of pending office actions for the company. With 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution is focused on a single point of contact. This examiner is responsible for the only pending matter currently identified for the company. The examiner's role is the primary element in the company's current patent office engagement. This centralized interaction ensures that all feedback regarding the company's pending intellectual property comes from a single source.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN | 1 | 79.4% | +18.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18920885 | MULTIPOLAR-TYPE OUTPUT APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR | FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18920885 | MULTIPOLAR-TYPE OUTPUT APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR | FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18920885 | MULTIPOLAR-TYPE OUTPUT APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREFOR | FAIRCHILD, MALLIKA DIPAYAN | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 19, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial