Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Woodline Shade Solutions Inc. currently manages 1 pending office action within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner working within a distinct art unit. The focused nature of this portfolio suggests a highly concentrated prosecution effort rather than a broad filing strategy across multiple technical disciplines. Practitioners can observe that the company's current intellectual property interests are confined to a specific technical path within the USPTO.
The busiest examiner for the company is HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the total number of pending actions and the busiest examiner's workload both stand at the same value, the company's current interactions with the patent office are limited to a unique point of contact. This alignment simplifies the administrative tracking of the portfolio and allows for a direct relationship between the applicant and the examiner. The lack of diversity in art units and examiners indicates that the company is not currently facing the complexities of multi-front prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 1 | 61.4% | +22.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18754946 | Integrated Pulley System for an Umbrella | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 15d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18754946 | Integrated Pulley System for an Umbrella | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 15d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3636 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18754946 | Integrated Pulley System for an Umbrella | HAWK, NOAH CHANDLER | 3636 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 15d | Pending | Jun 26, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial