Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wrap Technologies Inc. currently manages 2 pending office actions within its patent portfolio. This legal activity is categorized under the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution process involves 2 distinct examiners and is distributed across 1 distinct art unit. GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S is the busiest examiner associated with the company, holding responsibility for 1 pending office action.
This volume of 2 pending office actions reflects the company's current engagement with the patent office. The presence of 1 distinct art unit indicates how the company's patent challenges are concentrated within a single technical division. Practitioners can observe that the workload is distributed among 2 distinct examiners, which requires managing multiple individual examiner timelines and preferences simultaneously. This interaction within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems portfolio necessitates careful coordination between the applicant and the office staff. The data shows a portfolio where active matters are reviewed by GOMBERG, BENJAMIN S and other officials, requiring a tailored approach to each outstanding issue. Each examiner and the 1 distinct art unit involved may have unique procedural expectations that the company must navigate to advance its intellectual property goals.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Double-patenting only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MORGAN, DERRICK R | 1 | 72.7% | +27.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19051499 | Sound Reducing Systems for Use with Projectile Launchers | MORGAN, DERRICK R | 1d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3641 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19051499 | Sound Reducing Systems for Use with Projectile Launchers | MORGAN, DERRICK R | 3641 | DP | Final Rejection | 1d overdue | Pending | Feb 12, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial