Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Wrapify Inc. currently has 1 pending office action in its patent portfolio. This 1 pending office action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which limits the current scope of the company's engagement with the patent office. The data shows 1 distinct art unit, indicating that the pending case is being reviewed within a specific technical division. This consolidated profile indicates a very specific or limited focus for the company's current intellectual property efforts.
HANCE, ROBERT J is the busiest examiner for the company, holding 1 busiest examiner pending action. Because HANCE, ROBERT J is the only 1 distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate prosecution success rests entirely on this individual's review. For the practitioner, this means that the entire active portfolio is subject to the specific examination style of HANCE, ROBERT J, with no other pending actions to provide alternative opportunities for patent allowance. The outcome of this 1 pending office action within the 1 distinct art unit will be the sole determinant of the portfolio's growth.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HANCE, ROBERT J | 1 | 66.5% | +21.5% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19085686 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING VISUAL IMPRESSIONS OF VEHICLES CONFIGURED WITH EXTERNAL GRAPHIC MESSAGING | HANCE, ROBERT J | 23d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19085686 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING VISUAL IMPRESSIONS OF VEHICLES CONFIGURED WITH EXTERNAL GRAPHIC MESSAGING | HANCE, ROBERT J | 23d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3992 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19085686 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ESTIMATING VISUAL IMPRESSIONS OF VEHICLES CONFIGURED WITH EXTERNAL GRAPHIC MESSAGING | HANCE, ROBERT J | 3992 | §101§103§112 | Final Rejection | 23d overdue | Pending | Mar 20, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial