Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Wright Medical Technology Inc.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 5 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 54 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Wright Medical Technology Inc. has 7 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The matters involve 7 distinct examiners and 5 distinct art units, showing full examiner dispersion and some repetition across technical units.

WAGGLE, JR, LARRY E is the busiest examiner, with 1 pending matter. The portfolio does not present a multi-matter examiner focus. Practitioners should tailor responses to each examination record while comparing recurring device-related issues within the repeated art-unit assignments.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (43%)
3
Medium (43%)
0
Easy (0%)
1
Unknown (14%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§102 only2 (29%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (43%)
No statute on record1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
14% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
71% of docket
1
Business / Other
14% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WAGGLE, JR, LARRY E 1 80.6% +17.2%
BATES, DAVID W 1 76.4% +16.7%
ACKUN, JACOB K 1 57.1% +3.3%
COLEY, ZADE JAMES 1 72.3% +26.0%
CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL 1 60.0% +38.9%
FISHBACK, ASHLEY LAUREN 1 80.0% +22.1%
FLORES, ADRIAN 1 100.0% +0.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19232020 TARGETING GUIDE AND ASSOCIATED METHOD WAGGLE, JR, LARRY E —

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19214229 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE BUNION SURGERY BATES, DAVID W —
19078866 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PLATE TRIAL PACKAGING ACKUN, JACOB K —
18331470 MULTIAXIAL MODULAR STEMS FLORES, ADRIAN —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19232020 TARGETING GUIDE AND ASSOCIATED METHOD WAGGLE, JR, LARRY E —
19214229 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE BUNION SURGERY BATES, DAVID W —
19063536 ANTERIOR ANKLE APPROACH SYSTEM AND METHOD COLEY, ZADE JAMES —
18960387 ALIGNMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL —
18945832 TALAR BONE PLATE FISHBACK, ASHLEY LAUREN —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3775 2
3799 1
3736 1
2877 1
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19232020 TARGETING GUIDE AND ASSOCIATED METHOD WAGGLE, JR, LARRY E 3775 §102Other Final Rejection — Pending Jun 09, 2025
19214229 METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE BUNION SURGERY BATES, DAVID W 3799 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 21, 2025
19078866 SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF PLATE TRIAL PACKAGING ACKUN, JACOB K 3736 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 13, 2025
19063536 ANTERIOR ANKLE APPROACH SYSTEM AND METHOD COLEY, ZADE JAMES 3775 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 26, 2025
18960387 ALIGNMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODS CARLSON, JOSHUA MICHAEL 2877 §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18945832 TALAR BONE PLATE FISHBACK, ASHLEY LAUREN — Other Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18331470 MULTIAXIAL MODULAR STEMS FLORES, ADRIAN 3774 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 08, 2023

Managing Wright Medical Technology Inc.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Wright Medical Technology Inc. have?

Wright Medical Technology Inc. has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 5 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Wright Medical Technology Inc. applications?

Jr, Larry E Waggle has the most, with 1 of Wright Medical Technology Inc.'s pending office actions.

What technology area are Wright Medical Technology Inc.'s patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month