Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

X-Golf Co. Ltd.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

X-Golf Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The company's prosecution is currently concentrated under 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused effort on a specific mechanical innovation. This streamlined approach allows for a clear and direct communication channel with the patent office. The presence of 1 pending office action in 1 distinct art unit suggests that the company is prioritizing a core technology within the medical device sector.

The busiest examiner, BALDORI, JOSEPH B, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending action. As this 1 action is the only one pending for the company, the examiner's interpretation of the claims will be the primary factor in the portfolio's immediate growth. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit means the company is not currently managing the complexities of different examination styles across multiple mechanical groups. This allows the company to focus all its resources on resolving the 1 pending office action efficiently with the assigned examiner.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

1
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
1
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

10 h
Manual time on pending OAs
2 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
4 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BALDORI, JOSEPH B 1 44.9% +30.1%

Interview Candidates (1)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18024874 SHOCK ABSORPTION NET FOR GOLF PRACTICE BALDORI, JOSEPH B —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3711 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18024874 SHOCK ABSORPTION NET FOR GOLF PRACTICE BALDORI, JOSEPH B 3711 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 06, 2023

Managing X-Golf Co. Ltd.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month