Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
X-Med AB maintains a patent portfolio concentrated in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently has 1 pending office action. Prosecution is conducted through 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, showing a specific technical focus for the company's filings. This concentration suggests that the intellectual property strategy is currently centered on a specific range of medical or mechanical innovations.
The busiest examiner assigned to this portfolio is MILLER, DANIEL A, who is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because there is 1 pending office action in total, this examiner manages the current workload for X-Med AB. This prosecution structure involves interaction with the USPTO within 1 administrative unit, which can simplify the tracking of examiner-specific preferences and procedural requirements for the applicant during the patent acquisition process.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MILLER, DANIEL A | 1 | 33.9% | +58.0% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18900710 | HALO GRAVITY TRACTION APPARATUS WITH ADJUSTABLE BIASING MECHANISM | MILLER, DANIEL A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3786 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18900710 | HALO GRAVITY TRACTION APPARATUS WITH ADJUSTABLE BIASING MECHANISM | MILLER, DANIEL A | 3786 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Sep 28, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialX-Med AB has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Daniel A Miller has the most, with 1 of X-Med AB's pending office actions.
Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
