Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
X-Nav Technologies LLC is currently managing 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is situated in 1 distinct art unit, showing a concentrated technical focus for the company's current patent applications. The prosecution involves 1 distinct examiner, WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE, who is handling the pending work. This concentration in 1 distinct art unit allows for a specialized legal approach tailored to specific technical standards.
WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE is the busiest examiner for this portfolio, with 1 pending office action under her review. Since the company only has 1 pending office action, this examiner oversees the entire current pending workload. The involvement of 1 distinct examiner suggests a very direct prosecution environment. Practitioners can concentrate their efforts on meeting the specific expectations of WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE and the technical standards of the assigned art unit to advance the application.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 1 | 14.3% | +100.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18176109 | DETECTION SYSTEM USING SCAN BODIES WITH OPTICALLY DETECTABLE FEATURES | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 7d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18176109 | DETECTION SYSTEM USING SCAN BODIES WITH OPTICALLY DETECTABLE FEATURES | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 7d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3772 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18176109 | DETECTION SYSTEM USING SCAN BODIES WITH OPTICALLY DETECTABLE FEATURES | WEBB LYTTLE, ADRIENA JONIQUE | 3772 | §102§112 | Final Rejection | 7d | Pending | Feb 28, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial