Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Xaba Inc. is currently managing 2 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are handled by 2 distinct examiners across 2 distinct art units. This one-to-one ratio between actions, examiners, and art units indicates that each matter is being treated as a unique technical and procedural challenge within the patent office.
MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD is the busiest examiner for the company. This examiner is responsible for 1 pending office action. Because the workload is split evenly across 2 distinct examiners, no single individual has a dominant influence over the portfolio's progress. This distribution requires the company to maintain separate prosecution strategies tailored to the specific requirements of each examiner.
The 2 distinct art units involved suggest a diverse technical range within the Chemistry & Materials sector. The 1 pending office action assigned to the busiest examiner, MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD, reflects the current lack of consolidation in the company's patent pipeline. Practitioners should be prepared to address the nuances of two different examination groups simultaneously.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §102 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD | 1 | 67.1% | +31.9% |
| CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU | 1 | 63.0% | +24.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18752646 | TECHNIQUES FOR FABRICATING COMPOSITE REBARS AND BEAMS | MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18752646 | TECHNIQUES FOR FABRICATING COMPOSITE REBARS AND BEAMS | MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD | — |
| 18348186 | TECHNIQUES FOR AUTOMATICALLY DEPOSITING ELECTRICAL WIRING | CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1754 | 1 |
| 3729 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18752646 | TECHNIQUES FOR FABRICATING COMPOSITE REBARS AND BEAMS | MALEKZADEH, SEYED MASOUD | 1754 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 24, 2024 |
| 18348186 | TECHNIQUES FOR AUTOMATICALLY DEPOSITING ELECTRICAL WIRING | CAZAN, LIVIUS RADU | 3729 | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 06, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial