Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Xiamen Ampace Technology Limited currently manages a company patent portfolio with 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to a distinct examiner, BROWN, MADISON ELIZABETH. As the busiest examiner for the company, BROWN, MADISON ELIZABETH is responsible for the 1 pending office action currently in the system.
The portfolio shows 0 distinct art units, which highlights a specific or early-stage prosecution status for the pending application. With a distinct examiner involved, the company's immediate patent goals are tied to a single review process. The pending office action constitutes the entirety of the portfolio's active interaction with the patent office.
Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of BROWN, MADISON ELIZABETH to resolve the 1 pending office action. The absence of multiple examiners or art units suggests that the portfolio is not currently diversified across different technical reviews. Consequently, the outcome of the pending office action is the primary factor in the company's current patent acquisition efforts.
The busiest examiner pending count of 1 confirms that the company's immediate patent goals are tied to a single review process. Reviewing the examiner's history can help anticipate potential hurdles and tailor the response. Monitoring the status of the pending office action is vital for timely adjustments to the broader intellectual property strategy.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| BROWN, MADISON ELIZABETH | 1 | — | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18606455 | NEGATIVE ELECTRODE PLATE, SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | BROWN, MADISON ELIZABETH | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18606455 | NEGATIVE ELECTRODE PLATE, SECONDARY BATTERY, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUS | BROWN, MADISON ELIZABETH | — | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 15, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial