Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days
Xiamen Hithium Energy Storage Technology Co. Ltd. currently manages 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This single action represents the full extent of the company's active prosecution workload. The concentration of this work within 1 distinct art unit suggests a specific and singular technical focus for the company's current patent applications.
The prosecution is being handled by 1 distinct examiner, ABRAHAM, JOSE K, who is currently assigned 1 pending office action. As the only examiner listed for the portfolio, ABRAHAM, JOSE K is responsible for the entirety of the company's pending matters. The fact that 1 examiner and 1 art unit are managing the 1 pending office action indicates a centralized prosecution process. Practitioners should focus their efforts on the specific examination style of this examiner, as the success of the current portfolio depends on the resolution of this single pending action. The absence of other examiners or art units means there is no diversification in the current prosecution strategy for the company.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABRAHAM, JOSE K | 1 | 83.2% | +32.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17946057 | CONDUCTIVE FILM AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR | ABRAHAM, JOSE K | 156d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17946057 | CONDUCTIVE FILM AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR | ABRAHAM, JOSE K | 156d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3729 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17946057 | CONDUCTIVE FILM AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR | ABRAHAM, JOSE K | 3729 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 156d overdue | Pending | Sep 16, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial