Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Y9 Inc. maintains 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. Prosecution is currently distributed across a distinct examiner and a single art unit. This narrow distribution suggests that the company's intellectual property is currently focused on a specific mechanical or commercial innovation.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is ALLADIN, AMBREEN A. This examiner is managing 1 busiest examiner pending office action, which accounts for all active office actions currently facing the company. A centralized prosecution environment like this one allows for direct communication with the examiner, but it also concentrates the risk of the portfolio's success on a single individual's interpretation of the prior art.
Practitioners should consider that the consistency of the examiner's feedback will be a primary factor in the prosecution timeline. The classification of the technology area within the assigned art unit indicates that the patent application is being reviewed by a group specialized in transportation or mechanical systems. Successful navigation of this process will depend on aligning the claims with the specific standards of this art unit.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALLADIN, AMBREEN A | 1 | 24.6% | +24.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18203907 | CELLULAR PHONE-BASED CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATION AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNT | ALLADIN, AMBREEN A | 126d overdue |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18203907 | CELLULAR PHONE-BASED CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATION AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNT | ALLADIN, AMBREEN A | 126d overdue |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3691 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18203907 | CELLULAR PHONE-BASED CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATION AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNT | ALLADIN, AMBREEN A | 3691 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 126d overdue | Pending | May 31, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial