Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Yaar Inc. has 1 pending office action within the Computing & Software technology area. The company's prosecution activity is currently limited to 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit, indicating a very focused patent strategy. This concentration means that the company's current interactions with the patent office are localized within a single technical and administrative area, which can simplify the management of the portfolio.
The busiest examiner, SCHALLHORN, TYLER J, is responsible for 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This is the only pending action for the company, so the examiner's individual approach to Computing & Software will be the primary factor in the portfolio's progress. The involvement of only 1 distinct art unit simplifies the prosecution process, as there are no competing standards from other units.
Practitioners should prioritize the 1 pending office action and the specific examination style of SCHALLHORN, TYLER J, to effectively advance the company's patent applications. Analyzing the examiner's history within the 1 distinct art unit may reveal insights into how to best address the current rejections. The resolution of the 1 pending office action is the key next step for Yaar Inc.'s patent prosecution.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCHALLHORN, TYLER J | 1 | 35.6% | +14.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17244457 | WEB TASK AUTOMATION | SCHALLHORN, TYLER J | 34d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2144 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17244457 | WEB TASK AUTOMATION | SCHALLHORN, TYLER J | 2144 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Apr 29, 2021 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial