Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
The patent portfolio for Yantai-Jingshi Institute Of Material Genome Engineering currently shows 1 pending office action. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, which centralizes the prosecution process for the company. Notably, the data indicates 0 distinct art units associated with this activity, which may reflect a specific administrative categorization for the pending filing at this stage.
KOLLIAS, ALEXANDER C is identified as the busiest examiner for this entity, currently overseeing 1 busiest examiner pending office action. Because this examiner is responsible for the entirety of the portfolio's active examination workload, the legal team can focus its efforts on a specific set of requirements. This relationship allows for a direct line of communication with KOLLIAS, ALEXANDER C during the prosecution process.
Practitioners should consider that having 1 distinct examiner and 0 distinct art units creates a very narrow prosecution focus. The strategy for the 1 pending office action does not need to account for the complexities of multiple art units or varying examiner behaviors. Instead, the prosecution can be tailored specifically to the feedback provided by the assigned examiner, ensuring a streamlined approach to resolving the current matter.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| KOLLIAS, ALEXANDER C | 1 | 42.8% | +35.8% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18276166 | COMPOUND, GUEST MATERIAL OF LIGHT-EMITTING LAYER, ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE | KOLLIAS, ALEXANDER C | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18276166 | COMPOUND, GUEST MATERIAL OF LIGHT-EMITTING LAYER, ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE | KOLLIAS, ALEXANDER C | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18276166 | COMPOUND, GUEST MATERIAL OF LIGHT-EMITTING LAYER, ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE, AND DISPLAY DEVICE | KOLLIAS, ALEXANDER C | — | §101§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 07, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial