Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days
Yieldmo Inc. has 1 pending office action currently active in its patent portfolio. This matter is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, ELCHANTI, TAREK. There are 0 distinct art units listed for this portfolio, suggesting that the current prosecution activity is highly isolated or perhaps in a transitional phase within the office's internal tracking.
ELCHANTI, TAREK is the busiest examiner for the company, overseeing 1 pending office action. As this represents the total volume of 1 pending office action for the portfolio, the applicant's immediate focus is concentrated on this single examiner. Success for the portfolio depends on navigating the specific examination style of ELCHANTI, TAREK.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ELCHANTI, TAREK | 1 | 50.5% | +36.1% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19248815 | METHOD FOR MODELING VISUAL MEDIA CONSUMPTION | ELCHANTI, TAREK | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19248815 | METHOD FOR MODELING VISUAL MEDIA CONSUMPTION | ELCHANTI, TAREK | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19248815 | METHOD FOR MODELING VISUAL MEDIA CONSUMPTION | ELCHANTI, TAREK | — | §101 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 25, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial