Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
2 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Yildiz Teknik Universitesi has 2 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units. This distribution indicates that each of the university's active matters is being handled by a different examiner in a different specialized group, reflecting a variety of technical focuses within the chemistry field.
The busiest examiner for the portfolio is MCDONOUGH, JAMES E, who is responsible for 1 pending office action. Since there are 2 pending office actions and 2 distinct examiners, each examiner is managing exactly one case. This balanced workload across 2 distinct art units means that the university must navigate two different sets of examination standards simultaneously.
Managing 2 pending office actions across 2 distinct examiners requires a coordinated effort to ensure that the university's broader intellectual property goals are met. The 2 distinct art units involved show that the university's chemistry research is being evaluated by different specialized groups. Practitioners should be prepared for two independent prosecution timelines for these 2 pending actions.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCDONOUGH, JAMES E | 1 | 71.2% | +10.9% |
| SMITH, JENNIFER A | 1 | 60.9% | +26.9% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18568306 | CONTROLLED RELEASE GLASS FERTILIZER AND A METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME | SMITH, JENNIFER A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722598 | SUPPORTIVE PHASE SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING ANTIBACTERIAL AND REGENERATIVE DENTAL COMPOSITE FILLING MATERIALS | MCDONOUGH, JAMES E | — |
| 18568306 | CONTROLLED RELEASE GLASS FERTILIZER AND A METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME | SMITH, JENNIFER A | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1734 | 1 |
| 1731 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722598 | SUPPORTIVE PHASE SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING ANTIBACTERIAL AND REGENERATIVE DENTAL COMPOSITE FILLING MATERIALS | MCDONOUGH, JAMES E | 1734 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
| 18568306 | CONTROLLED RELEASE GLASS FERTILIZER AND A METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME | SMITH, JENNIFER A | 1731 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 08, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialYildiz Teknik Universitesi has 2 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 2 art units and 2 examiners.
James E Mcdonough has the most, with 1 of Yildiz Teknik Universitesi's pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
