Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
2 pending office actions • 0 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 2 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Yildiz Teknik Universitesi manages a company patent portfolio that currently includes 2 pending office actions. These 2 pending office actions are distributed across 2 distinct examiners, suggesting that the university is managing multiple lines of inquiry. The data shows 0 distinct art units, which indicates that these filings are not currently categorized across different technical divisions of the patent office.
With 2 distinct examiners and 0 distinct art units, the prosecution landscape is defined by individual examiner interactions rather than broader art unit trends. This structure requires the practitioner to address the specific concerns of each examiner independently. The lack of 0 distinct art units means that the technical context for the review remains centralized even as 2 different individuals conduct the examination.
MCDONOUGH, JAMES E is the busiest examiner, handling 1 busiest examiner pending office action. This 1 busiest examiner pending office action represents part of the total 2 pending office actions for the university. Practitioners must balance their efforts between MCDONOUGH, JAMES E and the other examiner to ensure that each of the 2 pending office actions is resolved effectively.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (50%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCDONOUGH, JAMES E | 1 | 71.1% | +10.9% |
| SMITH, JENNIFER A | 1 | 61.0% | +26.6% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18568306 | CONTROLLED RELEASE GLASS FERTILIZER AND A METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME | SMITH, JENNIFER A | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722598 | SUPPORTIVE PHASE SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING ANTIBACTERIAL AND REGENERATIVE DENTAL COMPOSITE FILLING MATERIALS | MCDONOUGH, JAMES E | — |
| 18568306 | CONTROLLED RELEASE GLASS FERTILIZER AND A METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME | SMITH, JENNIFER A | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18722598 | SUPPORTIVE PHASE SYSTEM FOR PRODUCING ANTIBACTERIAL AND REGENERATIVE DENTAL COMPOSITE FILLING MATERIALS | MCDONOUGH, JAMES E | — | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 21, 2024 |
| 18568306 | CONTROLLED RELEASE GLASS FERTILIZER AND A METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME | SMITH, JENNIFER A | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 08, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial