Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 2 patents granted in the last 365 days
Yongkang Saihan Electronic Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office action in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. This action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA, who works within a distinct art unit. JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, managing 1 pending action.
This concentration of the pending action under a single examiner and art unit points to a singular focus in the company's current prosecution. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements of the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering area as applied by this examiner. The total workload is entirely contained within this single examiner and art unit pairing. This streamlined structure provides a clear path for the resolution of the pending action. The lack of multiple examiners or art units minimizes the complexity of managing the company's current patent interests. By focusing on the individual review style of the assigned examiner, the company can better anticipate procedural hurdles. The alignment of the busiest examiner's workload with the total pending actions ensures a clear point of contact within the patent office. This concentration allows for a highly targeted approach to the pending office action.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA | 1 | 50.6% | +48.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18660010 | LIFTING STRUCTURE FOR TREADMILL | JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA | 55d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3784 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18660010 | LIFTING STRUCTURE FOR TREADMILL | JALALZADEH ABYANE, SHILA | 3784 | §103 | Final Rejection | 55d | Pending | May 09, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial