Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
You And 2 LLC is currently addressing 1 pending office action in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit, indicating a focused technical scope for the company's current patent application. This concentration allows for a direct and specialized approach to the examination process, as the company only needs to satisfy the requirements of a single technical group. Operating within this specific unit also helps in maintaining a consistent technical narrative for the company's intellectual property.
ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E serves as the busiest examiner for the portfolio, handling the 1 pending office action. With only 1 distinct examiner involved, the prosecution outcome is tied to the specific interpretations and requirements of this individual. Practitioners should analyze the examiner's past actions within the 1 distinct art unit to develop a response that effectively addresses the matter. Since the company has a single pending workload, the strategic focus is entirely on the assigned official, making it essential to understand their specific history of allowances and rejections.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E | 1 | 33.2% | +36.0% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16375016 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INCENTIVIZING CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS | ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E | 33d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16375016 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INCENTIVIZING CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS | ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E | 33d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3699 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16375016 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INCENTIVIZING CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS | ZELASKIEWICZ, CHRYSTINA E | 3699 | §101§103§112 | Non-Final OA | 33d | Pending | Apr 04, 2019 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial