Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
1 pending office actions • 0 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 3 patents granted in the last 365 days
Zahoransky AG currently manages 2 pending office actions in its patent portfolio. These actions are being handled by 2 distinct examiners, which means the workload is distributed across different individuals. MCPARTLIN, SARAH BURNHAM is the busiest examiner for the company, with 1 pending office action currently assigned.
With 2 pending office actions split between 2 distinct examiners, the company must address different sets of examiner feedback. This distribution suggests a prosecution effort where no single examiner controls the entire portfolio. The strategy for these applications will depend on the specific requirements of each individual official.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCPARTLIN, SARAH BURNHAM | 1 | 69.8% | +22.4% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18868265 | METHOD FOR SEPARATING BRISTLE BUNDLES, SEPARATING DEVICE, AND BRUSH-FILING MACHINE | MCPARTLIN, SARAH BURNHAM | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18868265 | METHOD FOR SEPARATING BRISTLE BUNDLES, SEPARATING DEVICE, AND BRUSH-FILING MACHINE | MCPARTLIN, SARAH BURNHAM | — |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18868265 | METHOD FOR SEPARATING BRISTLE BUNDLES, SEPARATING DEVICE, AND BRUSH-FILING MACHINE | MCPARTLIN, SARAH BURNHAM | — | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 22, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial