Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Zebbie Limited has a patent portfolio in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The portfolio currently contains 1 pending office action. This 1 action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, THOMAS HAYNES HENRY, who is also the busiest examiner for the portfolio with 1 pending office action.
The prosecution is concentrated within 1 distinct art unit. This alignment of 1 pending office action, 1 examiner, and 1 art unit indicates a singular focus for the portfolio's current activity. THOMAS HAYNES HENRY is the sole examiner responsible for the 1 pending office action currently under review.
The data reflects a very specific prosecution footprint for Zebbie Limited. With only 1 pending office action, the workload is minimal and centralized. The involvement of 1 distinct art unit and 1 distinct examiner, THOMAS HAYNES HENRY, ensures that the current prosecution is handled within a single technical and administrative channel in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| HENRY, THOMAS HAYNES | 1 | 51.8% | +35.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19007362 | INTERACTIVE CHARACTER SYSTEM WITH TOY CHARACTER RECOGNITION AND RESPONSE CUSTOMIZATION | HENRY, THOMAS HAYNES | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3715 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19007362 | INTERACTIVE CHARACTER SYSTEM WITH TOY CHARACTER RECOGNITION AND RESPONSE CUSTOMIZATION | HENRY, THOMAS HAYNES | 3715 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 31, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial