Technology area: Communications
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Zeica Labs Pte. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Communications technology area. This single action represents the entire active prosecution workload for the company at this time. The focus on Communications suggests a specialized portfolio strategy aimed at a specific sector of the market.
The prosecution is managed by 1 distinct examiner, Patel, Yogeshkumar G. As the only examiner involved, Patel is also the busiest examiner, holding 1 pending action. This distribution indicates that no other individuals are currently reviewing the company's work, which allows for a very focused communication channel between the applicant and the patent office.
All activity is confined to 1 distinct art unit. This indicates that the pending innovation is classified within a specific technical niche rather than being spread across multiple disciplines. The lack of multiple art units simplifies the administrative oversight required for these filings, as there is only one set of art unit trends to monitor.
For practitioners, the primary task is to analyze Patel's specific history within this 1 art unit. Since there are no other pending actions, the outcome of this single case will determine the company's immediate success in the Communications sector. The strategy should be tailored to Patel's past examination patterns and the specific requirements of the assigned art unit to ensure a favorable result.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| PATEL, YOGESHKUMAR G | 1 | 83.6% | +3.2% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19012218 | SYSTEM AND A PROCESSING METHOD FOR CUSTOMIZING AUDIO EXPERIENCE | PATEL, YOGESHKUMAR G | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2691 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19012218 | SYSTEM AND A PROCESSING METHOD FOR CUSTOMIZING AUDIO EXPERIENCE | PATEL, YOGESHKUMAR G | 2691 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 07, 2025 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialZeica Labs Pte. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Yogeshkumar G Patel has the most, with 1 of Zeica Labs Pte. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Communications (USPTO Tech Center 2600), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
