Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology area: Computing & Software
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Zettablock Inc. has 1 pending office action in the Computing & Software technology area. This action is handled by 1 distinct examiner in 1 distinct art unit. The current prosecution activity is highly centralized. For the applicant, this means that the success of the current filing depends on meeting the specific requirements of the 1 distinct art unit. This concentration allows for a very targeted approach to the pending matter but also limits the scope of current USPTO interactions to a single technical group.
ALMANI, MOHSEN is the busiest examiner, managing 1 pending office action. This accounts for the total of 1 pending office action for the portfolio. The use of 1 distinct examiner and 1 distinct art unit suggests a narrow and focused interaction with the USPTO at this time. Practitioners should focus on the specific requirements and past tendencies of ALMANI, MOHSEN to navigate this pending matter. The limited volume of 1 pending office action suggests that the company's current activity in the Computing & Software sector is highly focused on this individual case.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALMANI, MOHSEN | 1 | 50.1% | +21.9% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18821721 | Intelligent Query Routing based on Query Storage Cost for Tiered Databases | ALMANI, MOHSEN | 41d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2159 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18821721 | Intelligent Query Routing based on Query Storage Cost for Tiered Databases | ALMANI, MOHSEN | 2159 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 41d | Pending | Aug 30, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial