Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
1 pending office actions • 1 art units • 1 examiners • 0 of 1 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Zhejiang Jiaowang Technology Co. Ltd. currently has 1 pending office action in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. This single action is assigned to 1 distinct examiner, reflecting a highly focused point of prosecution. The data also shows that this work is contained within 1 distinct art unit, which limits the administrative variety the company faces in its current patent applications.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is GROSS, CARSON, who is handling 1 pending office action. Because the total number of pending office actions for the company is 1, this specific examiner is responsible for the entirety of the company's active prosecution. This creates a situation where the outcome of the company's current patent efforts is tied to the review of this single individual.
Practitioners should note that the concentration of 1 pending office action within 1 art unit and under 1 examiner simplifies the monitoring process. However, it also means there is no diversification of risk across different examiners or technology groups. The specific tendencies of GROSS, CARSON will be the primary factor in the resolution of the 1 pending action currently on the docket.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §112 only | 1 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| GROSS, CARSON | 1 | 73.0% | +21.5% |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18824871 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GLUING AND LAMINATING | GROSS, CARSON | 57d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1746 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18824871 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GLUING AND LAMINATING | GROSS, CARSON | 1746 | §112 | Final Rejection | 57d | Pending | Sep 04, 2024 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free TrialZhejiang Jiaowang Technology Co. Ltd. has 1 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 1 art units and 1 examiners.
Carson Gross has the most, with 1 of Zhejiang Jiaowang Technology Co. Ltd.'s pending office actions.
Mostly Chemistry & Materials (USPTO Tech Center 1700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.
