Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Ziehl-Abegg SE

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 6 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 4 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Ziehl-Abegg SE currently has 7 pending office actions within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. These 7 pending office actions are assigned to 7 distinct examiners, resulting in a completely decentralized prosecution environment where no two actions share the same examiner. Furthermore, these matters are spread across 6 distinct art units, showing a very high degree of technical fragmentation for a portfolio of this size. This diversity requires the company to manage 7 different examiner relationships across 6 different supervisory environments.

BRINEY III, WALTER F is identified as the busiest examiner with 1 pending office action. Because the 7 pending office actions are split among 7 distinct examiners, every examiner is equally busy with respect to this specific portfolio. The fact that there are 6 distinct art units for only 7 pending office actions implies that almost every application is being treated as a unique technical category. Practitioners must navigate 7 different examiner styles across these 6 distinct art units within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (14%)
6
Medium (86%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only6 (86%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (14%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
14% of docket
2
Semiconductors
29% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
57% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BRINEY III, WALTER F 1 65.3% +4.5%
STOUT, RILEY OWEN 1 75.5% -3.6%
ZOLLINGER, NATHAN C 1 69.6% +40.0%
HANCOCK, DIANA ROBERT 1 81.3% +6.0%
DAVIS, JASON GREGORY 1 74.2% +18.2%
KASTURE, DNYANESH G 1 48.0% +26.1%
LEGENDRE, CHRISTOPHER RYAN 1 75.2% +26.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18685800 METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVELY DETERMINING CURRENT OPERATING-STATE-DEPENDENT VARIABLES, MORE PARTICULARLY THE CURRENT CONVEYED VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, OR A FAN, AND FAN FOR APPLICATION OF THE METHOD HANCOCK, DIANA ROBERT 28d

Hard Cases (1)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18841828 ELECTRIC MOTOR AND CORRESPONDING APPLICATION STOUT, RILEY OWEN —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18257238 FAN AND SCROLL HOUSING FOR FAN DAVIS, JASON GREGORY 2d overdue
17635814 METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF A CURRENT OPERATING STATE-DEPENDENT VARIABLE OF A FAN, IN PARTICULAR A PRESSURE CHANGE OR PRESSURE INCREASE, AND FAN LEGENDRE, CHRISTOPHER RYAN 2d overdue
18687484 METHOD FOR OPERATING A FAN, AND SYSTEM FOR CARRYING OUT SAID METHOD ZOLLINGER, NATHAN C —
17792359 SUPPORT MODULE FOR A FAN AND FAN HAVING A CORRESPONDING SUPPORT MODULE KASTURE, DNYANESH G —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3746 2
2692 1
2834 1
2852 1
3745 1
3711 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18845999 METHOD FOR ACTIVELY MONITORING SOUND EMISSIONS OF TURBOMACHINERY, SYSTEM COMPRISING TURBOMACHINERY, AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT THE METHOD BRINEY III, WALTER F 2692 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 11, 2024
18841828 ELECTRIC MOTOR AND CORRESPONDING APPLICATION STOUT, RILEY OWEN 2834 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 27, 2024
18687484 METHOD FOR OPERATING A FAN, AND SYSTEM FOR CARRYING OUT SAID METHOD ZOLLINGER, NATHAN C 3746 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2024
18685800 METHOD FOR QUANTITATIVELY DETERMINING CURRENT OPERATING-STATE-DEPENDENT VARIABLES, MORE PARTICULARLY THE CURRENT CONVEYED VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE, OR A FAN, AND FAN FOR APPLICATION OF THE METHOD HANCOCK, DIANA ROBERT 2852 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Feb 22, 2024
18257238 FAN AND SCROLL HOUSING FOR FAN DAVIS, JASON GREGORY 3745 §103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Jun 13, 2023
17792359 SUPPORT MODULE FOR A FAN AND FAN HAVING A CORRESPONDING SUPPORT MODULE KASTURE, DNYANESH G 3746 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 12, 2022
17635814 METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF A CURRENT OPERATING STATE-DEPENDENT VARIABLE OF A FAN, IN PARTICULAR A PRESSURE CHANGE OR PRESSURE INCREASE, AND FAN LEGENDRE, CHRISTOPHER RYAN 3711 §103 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Feb 16, 2022

Managing Ziehl-Abegg SE's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

How many pending USPTO office actions does Ziehl-Abegg SE have?

Ziehl-Abegg SE has 7 pending office actions as of October 2026, spread across 6 art units and 7 examiners.

Which USPTO examiner handles the most Ziehl-Abegg SE applications?

Walter F Briney III has the most, with 1 of Ziehl-Abegg SE's pending office actions.

What technology area are Ziehl-Abegg SE's patent applications in?

Mostly Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering (USPTO Tech Center 3700), based on where its pending office actions are examined.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month