Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Examiner: KIRK, BRYAN J

Tech Center 3600 • Art Units: 3628

This examiner grants 34% of resolved cases

Analysis

Bryan J Kirk examines applications in Art Unit 3628 of Tech Center 3600. He has 229 resolved cases and an allowance rate of 33.6%. This rate indicates a challenging prosecution environment where many applications are abandoned, requiring persistence and technical clarity from applicants to reach a grant.

However, the interview lift is 43.7%. This suggests that interviews are an exceptionally powerful tool for this examiner. Applicants who engage in interviews have a much higher chance of overcoming the 33.6% baseline allowance rate. Direct communication appears to be the most effective way to address the examiner's concerns and move toward a successful outcome.

The median days to allowance is 1348. This long timeline reflects the difficulty of the docket. Practitioners should be prepared for a long process and should use interviews early to improve their chances of success. Leveraging the 43.7% interview lift is critical for navigating the 1348-day median prosecution period effectively.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

33.6%
Allow Rate
-18.4% vs TC avg
265
Total Applications
+43.7%
Interview Lift
1348
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 229 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

34.0%
§101 Eligibility
6.1%
§102 Novelty
37.8%
§103 Obviousness
19.0%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19077001 GENERATING ENERGY WINDOWS Final Rejection Apple Inc.
19142390 INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, METHOD OF OFFERING CONTRACT, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM Non-Final OA DAIKIN INDUSTRIES, LTD.
18631827 INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS MANAGING CONSUMABLE PRODUCT OF IMAGE FORMING APPARATUS, CONTROL METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM Final Rejection CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA
18726853 INFORMATION PROVISION APPARATUS, TERMINAL APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROVISION METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM Final Rejection NEC Corporation
19057150 PARALLELIZED MULTI-OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING FOR COMPLEX SCHEDULING OPTIMIZATION Final Rejection SAUDI ARABIAN OIL COMPANY
19292764 GENERATING A FIXED VALUE FOR A RECURRING VALUE LOCK ACROSS GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES OF COMPUTING DEVICES Non-Final OA Lyft, Inc.
18839116 RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM Non-Final OA NTT DOCOMO, INC.
18185543 DELIVERY LOSS MITIGATION Non-Final OA INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
19058356 OPTIMAL ROUTE PLANNING AND VEHICLE CAPACITY UTILIZATION WITH MANAGEMENT OF INCOMPATIBLE COMMODITIES IN LOGISTICS Non-Final OA Tata Consultancy Services Limited
18500930 TRAINED COMPUTER MODEL FOR IDENTIFICATION OF WRONG DELIVERY LOCATION FOR AN ORDER PLACED AT AN ONLINE SYSTEM Final Rejection Maplebear Inc.
18907029 Vehicle Request Coordination System for Multi-Client Computing Ecosystem Final Rejection Joby Aero, Inc.
18647302 ACCREDITATION DETERMINATION OF A REVIEW ENTITY OF A COMPUTING PRODUCT Final Rejection Dell Products L.P.
18815823 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION WITH CONFIDENCE RATINGS Non-Final OA MASTERCARD TECHNOLOGIES CANADA ULC
19047809 LINEAGE BASED APPROACH TO MEASURE CARBON FOOTPRINT IN DISTRIBUTED WORKFLOWS Non-Final OA HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
18488005 TECHNOLOGIES FOR DYNAMIC FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTION GENERATION AND CONTACT CENTER AGENT ASSIST INTEGRATION Non-Final OA Genesys Cloud Services, Inc.
18601897 HANDLING DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN ORDERED AND DELIVERED ITEMS AT THE TIME OF DELIVERY Final Rejection MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month